RE: [registrars] Proposed ballot on Constituency statement to GNSO regarding Domain Tasting.

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob, as I said, since I took your amendment as not friendly I think the
ballot should look more like what I have below. Otherwise, what's the
point of having taking it as not friendly since you are basically
getting to take the vote anyway?

The Main Motion:

[text of main motion goes here]

Proposed alternate motion (will require another vote if accepted):

Moved that a vote be taken to determine the position of the members of
the Registrars Constituency on Domain Tasting. The vote would consist of
selecting one of the following views:

1. Approve a Constituency position statement that its members are
opposed to Domain Tasting in principle, promulgating a statement similar
to View 1 of the Main Motion, above.

2. Approve a Constituency position statement that many of its members
believe that Domain Tasting should not be a matter of concern or action
by the GNSO or ICANN, promulgating a statement similar to View 2 of the
Main Motion, above.

-----Begin ballot-----

Please select one:
/_/ Approve the Main Motion as written
/_/ Approve the Alternate Motion and call for vote
/_/ Disapprove both Motions
/_/ Abstain

------End ballot------
 

Tim 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [registrars] Proposed ballot on Constituency statement to GNSO
regarding Domain Tasting.
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, November 29, 2007 12:49 am
To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Dear Members: The following proposed ballot on a motion is being
published in accordance with Article I.8 of the Rules of Procedure:

8. The Secretary will create and publish the ballot. The ballot will
remain open for inspection and possible amendment or correction for 72
hours prior to the vote. end quote:

The Main Motion:

Moved that we accept the following as the RC position statement and
submit it to the GNSO Council as such:

The Registrars Constituency (RC) has not reached Supermajority 
support for a particular position on Domain Name Tasting. Below 
are statements of the views/positions espoused by RC members. 

View 1. Many registrars believe that Tasting should be curbed if not 
eliminated altogether for one or more of the following reasons:

a. Tasting is causing general confusion among registrants and 
potential registrants trying to register domain names.

b. Tasting is eroding consumer confidence in the security and 
trustworthiness of domain name registration services and our 
industry in general.

c. Tasting is causing an increase in support costs for Registrars.

d. Tasting violates well-established codes of conduct and good 
practice intended to ensure security and stability by:

i. disturbing the stability of a set of existing services that 
had been functioning satisfactorily, namely the competitive 
domain name registration services developed by Registrars;

ii. disturbing other existing systems and value added services, 
for example those relying on Zone files, and various third party 
WHOIS services;

iii. increasing costs that must be absorbed by others not 
participating in or benefiting from Tasting.

e. Despite the long held tenet of "First do no harm," there has 
been no research, testing for potential disruption of existing 
services, public review, or comment prior to this high volume 
activity abruptly occurring in the DNS.

In summary, high volume Tasting activity has undermined expectations 
about reliable behavior and in so doing has reduced trust in the 
security and stability of the system and has increased costs for 
registrars, registrants, and others not participating in the 
activity.

View 2. Many registrars believe that Tasting should not be a matter 
of concern or action by the GNSO or ICANN for one or more of the 
following reasons:

a. Tasting takes place due to market demand, and the market 
should be allowed to evolve as demand dictates.

b. ICANN is not a regulatory body, and according to its own 
bylaws, coordinates policy development reasonably and 
appropriately related to technical functions of the DNS. ICANN 
should not be regulating market activity.

Notwithstanding the above, the RC is in near unanimous agreement that 
sun-setting the Add Grace Period (AGP) is not an appropriate action 
should the GNSO decide to address Tasting activity. Many Registrars 
who do not participate in Tasting use the AGP in various ways not 
related to Tasting, as detailed in section 4.4 of the Outcomes Report 
of the GNSO Ad Hoc Group on Domain Name Tasting. Report found here:

http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-domain-tasting-adhoc-outcomes-report-final.pdf

Sun-setting the AGP would unnecessarily put additional burdens and 
costs on Registrars and Registrants using the AGP for these 
non-Tasting reasons.

To the extent that the GNSO should decide to recommend policy or 
actions with the intent of curbing or eliminating Tasting activity, 
RC members are in general agreement that:

Preferred - The GNSO should recommend that ICANN make the 
transactional fee component of the variable Registrar fees apply to 
all new registrations except for a reasonable number that are deleted 
within the AGP. Implementation time for Registrars would be negligible.

Acceptable but not preferred - The GNSO should encourage gTLD 
Registries to only allow AGP refunds on a reasonable number of new 
registrations, noting that such action is affective only if all gTLD 
registries apply it, and do so in a reasonably consistent manner. 
Implementation time for Registrars could be substantial depending on 
how each Registry decided to define their policy. If Registrars need to 
modify their systems and/or services a minimum of 90-days advance 
notice should be given.

Note: Neither of the above actions requires new policy or 
modifications to existing policy. Therefore the RC, regardless of their 
view, is generally opposed to a PDP on this issue.

Here is the ballot on the Main Motion:

1. Motion to adopt Tasting Position Statement, above:
/_/ Approve
/_/ Disapprove
/_/ Abstain

Amendment to the Main Motion:

Moved that a vote be taken to determine the position of the members of
the Registrars Constituency on Domain Tasting.

Here is the ballot on the Amendment:

2. Approve a Constituency position statement that its members are
opposed to Domain Tasting in principle, promulgating a statement similar
to View 1 of the Main Motion, above:
/_/ Yes
/_/ No
/_/ Abstain

3. Approve a Constituency position statement that many of its members
believe that Domain Tasting should not be a matter of concern or action
by the GNSO or ICANN, promulgating a statement similar to View 2 of the
Main Motion, above:

/_/ Yes
/_/ No
/_/ Abstain

End of ballot:

Please send any comments you have to me via the regular RC mailing list.

Respectfully submitted,
Bob Connelly
Secretary
Registrar Constituency