<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] WG: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 20 November 2007
- To: <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] WG: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 20 November 2007
- From: "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:16:37 +0100
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcgsSLZuLvckBqTOTl6L4Z1uBeXz1wAAE5xw
fyi, the outcome of yesterdays council call.
Best,
tom
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. November 2007 15:13
An: 'Council GNSO'
Betreff: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 20 November 2007
Dear Council Members,
Ahead of the complete minutes, please find the resolutions that were passed
by the GNSO Council teleconference on Tuesday 20 November 2007.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
............................................................................
Resolution 1
Whereas, the Council has previously requested and received both the 15 June
2007 "GNSO Issues Report on Dispute Handling for IGO Names and
Abbreviations"
http://www.gnso.icann.org/issues/igo-names/issues-report-igo-drp-15jun07.pdf
and the 28 September 2007 "Staff Report on Draft IGO Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Procedure;"
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-igo-drp-report-v2-28sep07.pdf
and
Whereas, the Council believes that further work on the draft IGO Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Procedure is appropriate before voting on whether to
initiate a policy development process on this issue; and
Whereas, the Intellectual Property Constituency is drafting and expects to
distribute not later than 28 November a revised proposed draft dispute
resolution procedure,
Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Council postpones until its 20
December meeting the vote on whether to initiate a policy development
process.
Resolution 2
Whereas the issues report on Inter-Registrar Transfers
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/transfers/issues-report-transfer-denial-clarifi
cations-19oct07.pdf
has been released and discussed
The GNSO council resolves to initiate a PDP to address the issues set forth
in the Issues Report by the Staff.
Resolution 3 failed
Whereas the Council has decided to initiate a PDP on Inter-registrar
Transfers, a Task Force will be created according to the By-laws, section 5
of Annex A of the GNSO Policy Development Process.
Thus
Pursuant to the ICANN Bylaws
http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#AnnexA-8
8. Procedure if No Task Force is Formed
a. If the Council decides not to convene a task force, the Council will
request that, within ten (10) calendar days thereafter, each constituency
appoint a representative to solicit the constituency's views on the issue.
Each such representative shall be asked to submit a Constituency Statement
to the Staff Manager within thirty-five (35) calendar days after initiation
of the PDP.
b. The Council may also pursue other options that it deems appropriate
to assist in the PDP, including appointing a particular individual or
organization to gather information on the issue or scheduling meetings for
deliberation or briefing. All such information shall be submitted to the
Staff Manager within thirty-five (35) calendar days after initiation of the
PDP.
c. The Staff Manager will take all Constituency Statements, Public
Comment Statements, and other information and compile (and post on the
Comment Site) an Initial Report within fifty (50) calendar days after
initiation of the PDP. Thereafter, the PDP shall follow the provisions of
Item 9 below in creating a Final Report.
--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|