<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Discussion of Motion to adopt Tasting Position Statement [Tim Ruiz's motion].
- To: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Discussion of Motion to adopt Tasting Position Statement [Tim Ruiz's motion].
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:41:37 +0100 (CET)
- Cc: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'Paul Goldstone'" <paulg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Nevett, Jonathon'" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrar Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <473CC452.9020103@nic-naa.net> from Eric Brunner-Williams at "Nov 15, 2007 02:12:34 pm"
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> John Berryhill wrote:
> >> who do you envision
> >> doing something about it if not ICANN?
> >>
> >
> > Verisign. Apart from the AGP, they have broad latitude in the
> > Registry-Registrar contract to define and address "abusive" practices.
> >
> > PIR eliminated tasting without all of this hullabaloo.
>
> Yup.
>
Hi,
it seems that tasting has not been eliminated, but greatly
reduced. However the approach is practical and fiddling with the
threshhold will yield better results. Other registries are
well-advised to follow this example.
Marcus
CORE Council of Registrars
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|