<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Discussion of Motion to adopt Tasting Position Statement [Tim Ruiz's motion].
- To: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Discussion of Motion to adopt Tasting Position Statement [Tim Ruiz's motion].
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:22:16 -0700
- Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.12.1
<html><body><div>Bob, you need one endorsement. I don't feel comfortable endorsing a motion that I will be taking as unfriendly.</div>
<div><BR><BR>Tim <BR><BR><BR></div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid" webmail="1">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE: [registrars] Discussion of Motion to adopt Tasting<BR>Position Statement [Tim Ruiz's motion].<BR>From: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Wed, November 14, 2007 10:10 am<BR>To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><BR><BR>At 04:41 AM 11/14/2007 Wednesday -0700, <A onclick="Popup.composeWindow('pcompose.php?sendto=tim%40godaddy.com'); return false;" href="https://email.secureserver.net/pcompose.php?aEmlPart=0&type=replyall&folder=INBOX&uid=117441#Compose">tim<B></B>@godaddy.com</A> wrote:<BR>>You are right, no previous vote has taken place, and if there is better wording for the motion I am open to it. <BR><BR>Dear Tim: I don't see how you can possibly state "The Registrars Constituency (RC) has not reached Supermajority <BR>support for a particular position on Domain !
Name Tasting" if the RC has not made any attempt at reaching a consensus or supermajority.<BR><BR>My unfriendly amendment, put forth to be balloted simultaneously with the main motion, will be as follows:<BR><BR>Amend motion "to accept the following as the RC position statement and submit it to the GNSO Council as such, etc."<BR><BR>Amendment:<BR><BR>Inasmuch as there has been much written on domain tasting and kiting in the general RC mail list, and,<BR><BR>Inasmuch as there has been no definitive work or ballot to find a consensus or supermajority among ICANN Accredited Registrars, <BR><BR>Now, therefore, I move that a vote be taken to determine the position of the members of the Registrars Constituency on domain tasting and kiting. <BR><BR>Thank you, Tim, for your offer to accept this amendment as an unfriendly amendment, to be balloted simultaneously with the Main motion.<BR><BR>Regards, BobC<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|