<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Registrar Constituency Agenda -- LA Meeting
- To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Registrar Constituency Agenda -- LA Meeting
- From: "DotAlliance" <helen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:34:51 -0700
- Cc: "Nevett,Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <20071023180555.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.0f558de6df.wbe@email.secureserver.net>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Tim!
Thank you!
I am rapidly finding out that unless I ask silly questions I will never know!
So is this something that DotAlliance should be joining?
Does it work well in contacting registrars?
I'd like to see a method that will allow a a phishing site to be shut down very fast
It also says:
"The mailing list now holds representatives from most of the big registrars."
So that definitely, probably covers Go Daddy!
However, I am greedy and want the lot!
And obviously I am only asking...
Best,
Helen
Dotalliance Inc.
www.dotalliance.com
.
--- Original Message -----
From: Tim Ruiz
To: DotAlliance
Cc: Nevett,Jonathon ; Registrar Constituency
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:05 PM
Subject: RE: [registrars] Registrar Constituency Agenda -- LA Meeting
Helen, appreciate the concern. However, the Registrar Operations (reg-ops) mailing list was created for the same purpose. Go Daddy has relevant employees who are members, as do a number of other registrars, and some of the anti-phishing groups, etc.. I would prefer to continue using it instead of starting another contact list. For more info on reg-ops see:
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2006-02/msg00310.html
Best,
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [registrars] Registrar Constituency Agenda -- LA Meeting
From: "DotAlliance" <helen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, October 23, 2007 7:41 pm
To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrar
Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hopefully I am listed without issue this time on the RCA?
I recently received a very helpful call from Patrick Klass who works in cooperation with
phishtank.coma
Phistank.com is a free volunteer organisation and their efforts are to be applauded
He identified two phishing sites using our registrar and with that criteria I was able to identify and delete some 25 such domains within the 5 day delete period!
However, his problem is that he cannot contact most registrars and or ISPs to warn them.
Emails and phone calls are often a waste of time as the right person is not contacted.
Specifically he mentioned problems in contacting Google and register.com.
I am certain that all of us are most pleased to receive such information as we all hate phishers and the transaction is almost certainly fraudulent.
To this end I would like to submit a request to other registrars asking for contact information (phone and/or email) which would lead to timely response and closure of phishing site.
I would like to pass around a contact sheet in LA however please feel free to email me!
I will then pass this information only to responsible people and organisations working to remove phishing.
Hopefully this is satisfactory to everyone or if someone has a better idea?
Best,
Helen
Dotalliance Inc.
www.dotalliance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Nevett, Jonathon
To: Registrar Constituency
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 8:10 AM
Subject: [registrars] Registrar Constituency Agenda -- LA Meeting
Registrars:
The following (and attached) is the tentative agenda for the upcoming Registrar Constituency meeting in Los Angeles. The format is a bit different for this meeting with regard to Board interaction. We will have two or three Board members with us for the first half of the meeting followed by a visit from Vint and Paul for a wrap-up session. Also, this year we have moved the meeting with the Registry Constituency to the following day. Call-in numbers will be sent to the Voting List next week. Hope to see you in LA.
Thanks.
Jon
Tuesday, October 30, 2007 (Hilton Hotel, Bel Air Room)
9:00 - 9:15 Welcome/Announcements
9:15 - 12:00 Substantive Reports and Issue Discussion with Board Members
Ø Registrar Accreditation Agreement Working Group Status Report (Jon Nevett)
Ø Transfer Policy Issues Status Report (Ross Rader)
Ø New TLD Task Force Discussion (Tim Ruiz or Adrian Kinderis)
Ø Whois Working Group Discussion (Tom Keller)
Ø Tasting Working Group Discussion (Jothan Frakes)
Ø Q/A with Board Members
12:00 - 12:30 Lunch Served (Skenzo Sponsored)
Ø Website Presentation (Rob Hall)
12:30 - 14:00 ICANN Staff Discussions
Ø Registrar Liaison Staff Report/Discussion (Tim Cole/Mike Zupke)
Ø ICANN Compliance Staff Report/Discussion (Stacy Burnette)
Ø ICANN IDN Roadmap (Tina Dam)
Ø ICANN Strategic Plan Discussion (Doug Brent)
14:00 - 14:45 Wrap-up Board Interaction with Vint and Paul
14:45 - 15:15 .Post Presentation/Discussion (Paul Donohoe/Mike Palage)
15:15 - 15:30 Break
15:30 - 16:30 Meeting with ICANN Staff Re: Registrar Accreditation Agreement (CLOSED SESSION)
16:30 - 17:30 Internal Discussion Re: Registrar Accreditation Agreement (CLOSED SESSION)
17:30 - 17:45 Wrap-up (.se meeting to follow)
Wednesday, October 31, 2007 (Hilton Hotel, Newport B Room)
13:30 - 15:00 Registrar Constituency Meeting with Registry Constituency
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|