RE: [registrars] FW: .POST sTLD Communication

["Jay Westerdal" <jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why do we need a .POST? Can't they do this same thing with a sub-domain
like post.int?

  _____  

From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 6:04 PM
To: Registrar Constituency
Subject: [registrars] FW: .POST sTLD Communication



FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:   pritz-westmoreland [mailto:pritz-westmoreland@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Thursday, September 06, 2007 08:47 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:     Nevett, Jonathon
Subject:        .POST sTLD Communication

Dear Jon:

ICANN received the attached communication from the Universal Postal Union
(UPU) regarding its negotiation of the .POST sTLD agreement. The
communication is intended to share with the community and your constituency
the unique aspects of the .POST proposed business model and the benefits
that the proposed sTLD will bring to the DNS.

An announcement and this information are also posted on the ICANN web page
(www.icann.org).

A public comment forum has been established to receive feedback on the UPU
communication. Comments may be posted to stld-rfp-post@xxxxxxxxx and viewed
at http://forum.icann.org/lists/stld-rfp-post.

If you have questions about this please do not hesitate to contact me
(information below).

Sincerely,

Kurt Pritz
ICANN

4676 Admiralty Way, #330
Marina del Rey, CA  90292

+1.310.301.5809 (office)
+1.310.400.4184 (mobile)