RE: [registrars] Dues of $750 with "forgiveness" for those who choose to pay $250.

["Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob,

 

I think you are a little confused.  Pool.com is not a Registrar and
never has been.  It can not be a member of the Registrar Constituency.

 

And the acquisition registrars we have are prevented from being members
of the constituency by the bylaws.  I believe you advocated the changes
to the bylaws that prevent registrars owned by the same entity from
being members. 

 

Rob

 

From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:00 AM
To: Registrars Constituency; RC Voting Members
Subject: RE: [registrars] Dues of $750 with "forgiveness" for those who
choose to pay $250.

 

At 03:33 AM 7/30/2007 Monday  +0000, Rob Hall wrote:



And I think you will find that most of the letters we signed onto were
not official constituency positions, as those are voted.  Rather, when
an open call went out for a simple letter to ICANN by some Registrars,
we supported it with everything we had.  


Dear Rob: 2007 is the current year.  

In a court of law, this kind of act would be ruled a "common law
marriage".

BobC