<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] Candidates who have paid their dues.
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] Candidates who have paid their dues.
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:51:14 -0700
- Cc: "Cristin Donahue" <jberryhillcd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<html>
<body>
At 03:22 PM 11/3/2006 Friday -0500, John Berryhill wrote:<br><br>
Dear Registrars:<br><br>
This Email is posted in response to Paul Stahura's Email to Jon, as
follows:<br><br>
<font size=2>From: Paul Stahura<br>
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 9:54 AM<br>
To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br>
Subject: paid up, or not?<br><br>
<br>
I think all candidates running for election for a RC role should state
whether or not their ICANN payment obligations have been paid in full and
are up to date for each registrar for which they work/represent.<br><br>
</font>Please disregard my prior posting on this subject. My
response related to the voluntary *dues* we pay to the Registrars
Constituency. Paul was referring to the mandatory *fees* which we
must pay to ICANN.<br><br>
If a Registrar were to delay its payments to ICANN, it could build its
cash flow to enable it to play the "Millionaire's Game" of
"Add-Delete grace period abuse" (euphemistically called
"Domain Tasting") to the disadvantage to other ICANN Accredited
Registrars who pay their fees in a timely manner. We know how
RegisterFly.com played the cash flow game, don't we?<br><br>
We certainly should be informed whether any nominee were playing such a
game.<br><br>
While it is unlikely that anyone would accuse us of being a millionaire,
I can affirm that Domains Only, Inc. has paid it's ICANN fees in a timely
manner;-) I would appreciate your vote for me to be Secretary for
fiscal 2007-2008.<br><br>
Regards, BobC</body>
</html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|