ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] ALAC Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting

  • To: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] ALAC Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting
  • From: "Jeffrey Eckhaus" <jeckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 17:05:15 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB54045AEB42@balius.mit>
  • References: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB54045AEB42@balius.mit>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AceR8gRnIRMFrWSZSimV1uaworMCCgACIzfQACC8ZTA=
  • Thread-topic: [registrars] ALAC Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting
Bruce,

Can you please clarify something  -  at this point do we just sit and
wait for the issues report or do we need to comment on the content and
validity of the ALAC statement? (no comment!)

Thanks


Jeff



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 1:27 AM
To: Registrar Constituency
Subject: [registrars] ALAC Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, 8 May 2007 8:47 PM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting

Dear Council members,

The At-Large Advisory Committee is requesting that ICANN staff prepare
an Issues Report on Domain Tasting. The formal request is attached.

According to ICANN Bylaws, no action is required from Council at this
time. Once the Issues Report is delivered to the GNSO, Council must then
decide whether or not to initiate a PDP.

Alan
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>