<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] ALAC Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting
- To: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrar Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] ALAC Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting
- From: "Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 01:35:29 +1000
- In-reply-to: <018e01c7924b$56981b40$6701a8c0@cubensis>
- References: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB54045AEB42@balius.mit> <018e01c7924b$56981b40$6701a8c0@cubensis>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AceR8gRnIRMFrWSZSimV1uaworMCCgACIzfQABPpoSAAAVPT4A==
- Thread-topic: [registrars] ALAC Request for Issues Report on Domain Tasting
John,
I'm confused... was that a for or against?
Maybe it's too late here?
Adrian Kinderis
Chief Executive Officer
AusRegistry International Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.ausregistryint.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Berryhill
Sent: Wednesday, 9 May 2007 7:04 PM
To: 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'Registrar Constituency'
Subject: RE: [registrars] ALAC Request for Issues Report on Domain
Tasting
Let's see, we have:
"2. Creation of consumer confusion
[...]
4. Facilitation of Trademark Abuse
[...]
5. Facilitation of Criminal Activity"
and
"a small number of registrars are tying up millions of domain names that
could be registered by the remaining 600 registrars, inhibiting
effective
competition"
This report is a refreshing bold stand in favor enhanced competition in
the
areas of consumer confusion, trademark abuse, and criminal activity.
John Berryhill, Ph.d., Esq.
4 West Front St.
Media, PA 19063
(610) 565-5601
(267) 386-8115 fax
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|