<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Registrar Resolution
- To: "'registrars'" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Registrar Resolution
- From: "Thomas Barrett - EnCirca" <tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:14:02 -0400
- In-reply-to: <3A1DC1292D5F214DA33F797FE976A77C7DB2F8@exchange1.mm-ads.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acdr1HZPDFb2V4SpRk6qPZh6lJHcXAAC0OOAAABb/EA=
EnCirca supports this resolution.
However, I feel that the focus on data escrow misses the real issue. Data
escrow is of little help once names are deleted and re-registered by third
parties.
When RegisterFly failed to fund its registry accounts for renewals, Klaxons
and air raid sirens should have been ringing in the Registry management
offices. (they may well have, but what did they do?)
This resolution should include Registry participation as well. i.e. What
are gTLD registries expected to do when they detect such a problem?
For example, Registries need a process they can invoke to suspend deletion
of names so that ICANN has time to consider compliance and escrow issues.
There should be some language like:
Be it resolved that the undersigned registrars call for ICANN Staff to work
with the ICANN Registry and Registrar Constituencies to develop a process
that will detect Registrars who are failing to provide required services to
their customers
Tom Barrett
EnCirca
_____
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon
Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2007 9:11 AM
To: Registrar Constituency
Subject: [registrars] Registrar Resolution
Importance: High
Registrars:
A number of folks have collaborated in drafting the following resolution in
response to the recent events related to the de-accreditation of
RegisterFly.
Please indicate if you support the resolution and I will read it in Lisbon
along with a copy of those registrars in support.
Thanks.
Jon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Whereas, registrars only succeed if they provide valuable services to their
customers;
Whereas, registrants must be protected against the potential bad acts of
"fly-by-night" registries and registrars;
Whereas, it is incumbent on ICANN to protect registrants against the
potential bad acts of "fly-by-night" gTLD registries and registrars;
Whereas, ICANN Staff has recently formulated a new Compliance Program for
gTLD Registries and Registrars;
Whereas, ICANN Staff has recently announced its success in furthering a data
escrow requirement for gTLD registries
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-05mar07.htm;
Whereas, ICANN Staff has not yet specified a schedule, terms, or a format of
a data escrow requirement for gTLD registrars;
Whereas, many registrars currently secure registrant and domain name data
through various back-up methods, but that this practice is by no means
uniform or compulsory across all accredited registrars;
Whereas, the various back-up methods used by registrars may not be
sufficient in all cases to assist ICANN Staff in recovering such data in the
event of registrar business failure; and
Whereas, recent events have highlighted the need for a registrar data escrow
program and enhanced compliance efforts with regard to requirements in the
Registrar Accreditation Agreement.
Be it resolved that the undersigned registrars call for ICANN Staff to work
with the ICANN Registrar Constituency to finalize the terms of a gTLD
registrar data escrow program; and
Be it further resolved that the undersigned registrars call for ICANN Staff
to work with the ICANN Registrar Constituency to improve the effectiveness
of the ICANN Compliance Program for gTLD Registrars.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|