<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Statement XXX agreement
- To: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Statement XXX agreement
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:16:25 +1100
- In-reply-to: <20070308151424.GD32354@schlund.de>
- References: <20070308151424.GD32354@schlund.de>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcdhldIbJJ4EpkUsRuyss1/j5X+i5gAOYcMA
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Statement XXX agreement
Melbourne IT agrees.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Keller
> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2007 2:14 AM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Statement XXX agreement
>
> Hello,
>
> I drafted a statement in regard to the XXX agreement we can use
> in response to the public comment period which ends tomorrow.
>
> As I'm not sure if we can post this as an offical
> constituency statement
> I would suggest that people that are interested in supporting the
> statement just sign on to it and that I will post it as an individual
> comment tomorrow evening European time.
>
> Suggestions to the wording are welcomed ;)
>
> Best,
>
> tom
>
> --
>
> Herby we would like to raise our concerns in respect to a
> paragraph of the
> Proposed ICM Registry Agreement for .XXX Appendix S, Part 6,
> Public Whois
> Specification which reads as follows:
>
> Registrars will be required to participate in the operation
> of a cross-registry
> WHOIS database, which will provide searching capabilities and
> access to all
> information concerning domain name registrations regardless
> of which TLD the
> domain name is registered in or which registrar processed the
> domain name
> application.
>
> The requirement resulting out of this paragraph is out of
> scope for this
> agreement as it stands in no direct relation to the operations of the
> XXX registry.
>
> It is our believe that substantial new and generic
> obligations to registrars
> should in any case be subject to the consensus policy process
> as mandated by the
> Registrar Accreditation Agreement
> (http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm)
> which is designed to implement such new policies in a open
> and transparent way.
>
> As the paragraph in question establishes a new and generic
> obligation for registrars
> we have to object to the inclusion of this paragraph in the
> final verion of the
> XXX Registry Agreement.
>
> Signatories
> ...
> --
>
>
>
> Thomas Keller
>
> Domain Services
> 1&1 Internet AG
> Brauerstrasse 48 Tel. +49-721-91374-4534
> 76135 Karlsruhe, Germany Fax +49-721-91374-215
> 1und1.de Mail tom@xxxxxxxx
>
> Amtsgericht Montabaur HRB 6484
>
> Vorstand: Henning Ahlert, Hans-Henning Doerr, Ralph
> Dommermuth, Matthias Ehrlich
> Andreas Gauger, Matthias Greve, Robert Hoffmann, Achim Weiss
> Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Michael Scheeren
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|