<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] FW: [alerts] ICANN News Alert -- Proposed .MUSEUM sTLD Registry Agreement Posted for Public Comment
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: [alerts] ICANN News Alert -- Proposed .MUSEUM sTLD Registry Agreement Posted for Public Comment
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 00:25:58 -0800
- In-reply-to: <80450ED06C26C8478670D1053475157A02B431B0@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NS I.NET>
- References: <80450ED06C26C8478670D1053475157A02B431B0@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NSI.NET>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<html>
<body>
At 09:09 AM 3/3/2007 Saturday -0500, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font size=4>FYI ? please pay
particular attention to Appendix S, which permits the .museum Sponsor to
register up to 5,000 names directly with the Registry Operator.</font>
</blockquote><br>
Dear Jon: One basic "rule* from time immemorial was that the
registries were not to be registrars. Regards, BobC<br><br>
</body>
</html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|