RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

<div>
I think the intent of Feb06 is to reach a little farther and actually
have policy around the subjects of its terms of reference. Those would primarily affect the Registries' agreements with ICANN. The&nbsp;procedure we're looking for affects what happens when the Registries' want changes to their agreement with us.</div>
<div><BR><BR>Tim Ruiz<BR>Vice President<BR>Corp. Development &amp; Policy<BR>The Go Daddy Group, Inc.<BR>Mobile: 319-329-9804<BR>Office: 319-294-3940<BR>Fax: 480-247-4516<BR><A href="mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx";>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><BR>How am I doing? Please contact my direct supervisor at <A href="mailto:president@xxxxxxxxxxx";>president@xxxxxxxxxxx</A> with any feedback.<BR><BR>
This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only
by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments.<BR><BR></div>
<div   name="wmMessageComp"><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure<BR>From: Thomas Keller &lt;tom@xxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Mon, January 22, 2007 2:58 am<BR>To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><BR>Ok, one cup of coffee later ;).<BR><BR>The sentence was supposed to look like that:<BR><BR>Isn't that what the FEB 06 Taskforce is supposed to come up with?<BR><BR>Best,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>Am 22.01.2007 schrieb Thomas Keller:<BR>&gt; Am 19.01.2007 schrieb Tim Ruiz:<BR>
&gt; &gt; I would think&amp;nbsp;ICANN GC could come up with a base set
of terms that cannot change without Board approval. Other than that, the draft procedure looks fine.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Tim &lt;BR&gt;<BR>&gt; <BR>
&gt; Isn't that what the FEB 06 Taskforce is not supposed to come up
with?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Best,<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; tom<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; &lt;div &nbsp; name="wmMessageComp"&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &lt;BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px;
BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"&gt;-------- Original Message --------&lt;BR&gt;Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure&lt;BR&gt;From: "Nevett, Jonathon" &amp;lt;jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;&lt;BR&gt;Date: Fri, January 19, 2007 8:18 am&lt;BR&gt;To: "Thomas Keller" &amp;lt;tom@xxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;&lt;BR&gt;Cc: "Registrars Constituency" &amp;lt;registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx&amp;gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks Tom.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; No vote necessary -- just provide comments to the list and to
ICANN.<BR>&gt; &gt; &amp;nbsp;My&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; only proposed change to the proposal is to add a standard for
when<BR>&gt; &gt; these&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; decisions should go to the Board. &amp;nbsp;The current draft
is<BR>&gt; &gt; too&lt;BR&gt;discretionary in that regard. &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Jon&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;-----Original Message-----&lt;BR&gt;From: Thomas Keller [mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxx] &lt;BR&gt;Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:08 AM&lt;BR&gt;To: Nevett, Jonathon&lt;BR&gt;Cc: Registrars Constituency&lt;BR&gt;Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; Seems ok to me. Do we have to vote on this draft to formally
accept<BR>&gt; &gt; it&lt;BR&gt;and make it policy?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Best,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;tom&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Am 17.01.2007 schrieb Nevett, Jonathon:&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; From ICANN for our review and comment. &amp;nbsp;Thanks. &amp;nbsp;Jon&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; -----Original Message-----&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; From: Kurt Pritz [mailto:pritz@xxxxxxxxx] &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:02 PM&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; To: Nevett, Jonathon; Marie Zitkova&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; Cc: Tim Ruiz; Cherstubbs@xxxxxxx; Tim Cole; Mike
Zupke;<BR>&gt; &gt; Craig&lt;BR&gt;Schwartz;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Dan Halloran&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Subject: Draft Procedure&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Marie, Jon:&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Please share this information with your constituency groups.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; Attached is a draft procedure for considering gTLD
registry<BR>&gt; &gt; proposals&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; for amendments to the Registry-Registrar Agreement
(RRA). The<BR>&gt; &gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; procedure is intended to provide opportunity for
comment and<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; discussion and also provide
certainty as to timeframe for&lt;BR&gt;consideration.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; This draft arises from the new form of registry
agreements that<BR>&gt; &gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; requires ICANN approval for proposed changes to the
RRA. This draft<BR>&gt; &gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; procedure essentially provides for notice to
registrars of proposed<BR>&gt; &gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; changes, an opportunity for comment, and a forum for
possibly<BR>&gt; &gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; resolving areas of controversy. Not specifically
described in the<BR>&gt; &gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; procedure but included are public posting of major
changes changes<BR>&gt; &gt; to&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;gt; agreements as has been discussed in the recent past
and Board<BR>
&gt; &gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; approval of changes to ICANN
agreements in certain circumstances.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Please review and provide comment.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Regards,&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Kurt&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Kurt Pritz&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; ICANN&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; 4676 Admiralty Way, #330&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Marina del Rey. CA &amp;nbsp;90292&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; +1.310.301.5809 (office)&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; +1.310.400.4184 (mobile)&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Gruss,&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;tom&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;(__) &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;(OO)_____ &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;(oo) &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;/|\ A cow is not entirely full of&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;| |--/ | * &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;milk some of it is hamburger!&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;w w w &amp;nbsp;w &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Gruss,<!
 BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; tom<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; (__) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<BR>&gt; (OO)_____ &nbsp;<BR>&gt; (oo) &nbsp; &nbsp;/|\ A cow is not entirely full of<BR>&gt; &nbsp; | |--/ | * &nbsp; &nbsp;milk some of it is hamburger!<BR>&gt; &nbsp; w w w &nbsp;w &nbsp;<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR><BR>Gruss,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>(__) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<BR>(OO)_____ &nbsp;<BR>(oo) &nbsp; &nbsp;/|\ A cow is not entirely full of<BR>&nbsp;| |--/ | * &nbsp; &nbsp;milk some of it is hamburger!<BR>&nbsp;w w w &nbsp;w </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>