ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure

  • To: "Nevett,Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:06:02 -0700
  • Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.9.11

I would think&nbsp;ICANN GC could come up with a base set of terms that cannot change without Board approval. Other than that, the draft procedure looks fine.<BR><BR>Tim <BR>
<div   name="wmMessageComp"><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure<BR>From: "Nevett, Jonathon" &lt;jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: Fri, January 19, 2007 8:18 am<BR>To: "Thomas Keller" &lt;tom@xxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Cc: "Registrars Constituency" &lt;registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR><BR>Thanks Tom.<BR><BR>
No vote necessary -- just provide comments to the list and to ICANN.
&nbsp;My<BR>
only proposed change to the proposal is to add a standard for when
these<BR>
decisions should go to the Board. &nbsp;The current draft is
too<BR>discretionary in that regard. &nbsp;<BR><BR>Thanks.<BR><BR>Jon<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Thomas Keller [mailto:tom@xxxxxxxxxx] <BR>Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:08 AM<BR>To: Nevett, Jonathon<BR>Cc: Registrars Constituency<BR>Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure<BR><BR>
Seems ok to me. Do we have to vote on this draft to formally accept
it<BR>and make it policy?<BR><BR>Best,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>Am 17.01.2007 schrieb Nevett, Jonathon:<BR>&gt; From ICANN for our review and comment. &nbsp;Thanks. &nbsp;Jon<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; -----Original Message-----<BR>&gt; From: Kurt Pritz [mailto:pritz@xxxxxxxxx] <BR>&gt; Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:02 PM<BR>&gt; To: Nevett, Jonathon; Marie Zitkova<BR>
&gt; Cc: Tim Ruiz; Cherstubbs@xxxxxxx; Tim Cole; Mike Zupke;
Craig<BR>Schwartz;<BR>&gt; Dan Halloran<BR>&gt; Subject: Draft Procedure<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Marie, Jon:<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Please share this information with your constituency groups.<BR>&gt; <BR>
&gt; Attached is a draft procedure for considering gTLD registry
proposals<BR><BR>
&gt; for amendments to the Registry-Registrar Agreement (RRA). The
&nbsp;<BR>
&gt; procedure is intended to provide opportunity for comment and
&nbsp;<BR>&gt; discussion and also provide certainty as to timeframe for<BR>consideration.<BR>&gt; <BR>
&gt; This draft arises from the new form of registry agreements that
&nbsp;<BR>
&gt; requires ICANN approval for proposed changes to the RRA. This draft
&nbsp;<BR>
&gt; procedure essentially provides for notice to registrars of proposed
&nbsp;<BR>
&gt; changes, an opportunity for comment, and a forum for possibly
&nbsp;<BR>
&gt; resolving areas of controversy. Not specifically described in the
&nbsp;<BR>
&gt; procedure but included are public posting of major changes changes
to<BR><BR>
&gt; agreements as has been discussed in the recent past and Board
&nbsp;<BR>&gt; approval of changes to ICANN agreements in certain circumstances.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Please review and provide comment.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Regards,<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Kurt<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Kurt Pritz<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; ICANN<BR>&gt; 4676 Admiralty Way, #330<BR>&gt; Marina del Rey. CA &nbsp;90292<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; +1.310.301.5809 (office)<BR>&gt; +1.310.400.4184 (mobile)<BR>&gt; <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Gruss,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>(__) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<BR>(OO)_____ &nbsp;<BR>(oo) &nbsp; &nbsp;/|\ A cow is not entirely full of<BR>&nbsp;| |--/ | * &nbsp; &nbsp;milk some of it is hamburger!<BR>&nbsp;w w w &nbsp;w </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>