<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure
Seems ok to me. Do we have to vote on this draft to formally accept it
and make it policy?
Best,
tom
Am 17.01.2007 schrieb Nevett, Jonathon:
> From ICANN for our review and comment. Thanks. Jon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Pritz [mailto:pritz@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:02 PM
> To: Nevett, Jonathon; Marie Zitkova
> Cc: Tim Ruiz; Cherstubbs@xxxxxxx; Tim Cole; Mike Zupke; Craig Schwartz;
> Dan Halloran
> Subject: Draft Procedure
>
> Marie, Jon:
>
> Please share this information with your constituency groups.
>
> Attached is a draft procedure for considering gTLD registry proposals
> for amendments to the Registry-Registrar Agreement (RRA). The
> procedure is intended to provide opportunity for comment and
> discussion and also provide certainty as to timeframe for consideration.
>
> This draft arises from the new form of registry agreements that
> requires ICANN approval for proposed changes to the RRA. This draft
> procedure essentially provides for notice to registrars of proposed
> changes, an opportunity for comment, and a forum for possibly
> resolving areas of controversy. Not specifically described in the
> procedure but included are public posting of major changes changes to
> agreements as has been discussed in the recent past and Board
> approval of changes to ICANN agreements in certain circumstances.
>
> Please review and provide comment.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kurt
>
>
> Kurt Pritz
>
> ICANN
> 4676 Admiralty Way, #330
> Marina del Rey. CA 90292
>
> +1.310.301.5809 (office)
> +1.310.400.4184 (mobile)
>
Gruss,
tom
(__)
(OO)_____
(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
| |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
w w w w
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|