<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] 2 New Registry Service Proposals
- To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] 2 New Registry Service Proposals
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:30:03 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <80450ED06C26C8478670D1053475157A01A777AB@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NSI.NET> from "Nevett, Jonathon" at "Sep 26, 2006 10:44:02 pm"
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
the excess deletions fee is one of the models we discussed in
capetown. I think it is a good idea, though to prevent abuse it might
be an even higher fee than 5c. That is my 2c
Yours,
Marcus
> FYI - ICANN posted today two registry service proposals that are of
> interest to registrars --
> http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/submitted_app.html
> <http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/submitted_app.html> .
>
>
>
> First, NeuLevel has requested the ability to provide "partial bulk
> transfers."
>
>
>
> Second, PIR has requested the approval of an "Excess Deletions Fee" to
> be charged for "re-stocking" domain names during the Add-Grace period.
> I urge you all to review these applications and comment when
> appropriate.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|