ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] 2 New Registry Service Proposals

  • To: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] 2 New Registry Service Proposals
  • From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:30:03 +0200 (CEST)
  • Cc: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <80450ED06C26C8478670D1053475157A01A777AB@VAMAIL3.CORPIT.NSI.NET> from "Nevett, Jonathon" at "Sep 26, 2006 10:44:02 pm"
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

the excess deletions fee is one of the models we discussed in
capetown. I think it is a good idea, though to prevent abuse it might
be an even higher fee than 5c. That is my 2c

Yours,
Marcus


> FYI - ICANN posted today two registry service proposals that are of
> interest to registrars --
> http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/submitted_app.html
> <http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/submitted_app.html> .
> 
>  
> 
> First, NeuLevel has requested the ability to provide "partial bulk
> transfers." 
> 
>  
> 
> Second, PIR has requested the approval of an "Excess Deletions Fee" to
> be charged for "re-stocking" domain names during the Add-Grace period.
> I urge you all to review these applications and comment when
> appropriate.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  
> 
> Jon  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>