<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] GNSO PDP Dec 05: Draft Recommendations on new gTLDs
- To: "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] GNSO PDP Dec 05: Draft Recommendations on new gTLDs
- From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 13:20:28 +0530
- In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB540343480B@balius.mit>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcbYV791WrcKHYl+TiSNkibCLe90jAACydbgAD9IkxA=
> The alternative term that has been suggested by Ross Rader is
> "typographically similar". This seems to have support so far. The
"typographically similar" ... I like :) - I don't even mind "typographically
or phonetically similar"
- bhavin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|