Re: [registrars] Followup/clarification on yesterday's statement in confcall

["Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I am not sure what the question is. What kind of reference number are
you looking for and who is "they"?

Marcus


> Do you have a reference number that I can pass to them?
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:30 AM
> Subject: [registrars] Followup/clarification on yesterday's statement in confcall
> 
> 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > thinking about yesterday's call I realised that I created a
> > misunderstanding. 
> > CORE's position on the 25c per-domain fee for registrars is that this
> > model will not work for certain TLDs that are looking at high numbers
> > and may want to promote their TLD by free promotions that would allow
> > registrars to bundle a domain with another product. We encourage a
> > different model that introduces a variable fee based on the registry
> > price to the registrar. This can either be a percentage or we can
> > define price ranges, e.g.
> > 
> > rregistry price ICANN registrar fee
> > 0-1$            0.00c
> > 1-2$            0.05c
> > 2-3$            0.10c
> > 3-5$            0.20c
> > 5-10$           0.25c
> > 10$-20$         0.35c
> > 20$+            0.50c
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yours,
> > Marcus
> > 
> >
>