ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[registrars] Followup/clarification on yesterday's statement in confcall

  • To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [registrars] Followup/clarification on yesterday's statement in confcall
  • From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:30:23 +0200 (CEST)
  • Cc: kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi all,

thinking about yesterday's call I realised that I created a
misunderstanding. 
CORE's position on the 25c per-domain fee for registrars is that this
model will not work for certain TLDs that are looking at high numbers
and may want to promote their TLD by free promotions that would allow
registrars to bundle a domain with another product. We encourage a
different model that introduces a variable fee based on the registry
price to the registrar. This can either be a percentage or we can
define price ranges, e.g.

rregistry price ICANN registrar fee
0-1$            0.00c
1-2$            0.05c
2-3$            0.10c
3-5$            0.20c
5-10$           0.25c
10$-20$         0.35c
20$+            0.50c



Yours,
Marcus



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>