ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Nominations for Excom officers for 2006-2007


Bob,

I am not sure if the nominations expire if they aren't seconded, so to that end:

I would like to second the nomination of Bhavin Turakhia for Chair.
I would like to second the nomination of Tim Ruiz for CTO/Vice-Chair.
I would like to second the nomination of John Berryhill as Secretary.
I would like to second the nomination of Bob Connelly for Treasurer.

Please verify that I am a Member in good standing, and then I believe the next step is for Tim and John to accept, and for Bhavin, Tim, John and Bob to post their conflict of interest statements.

"Each nomination must be seconded by at least one additional Member in good standing. The nominee must accept the nomination and provide a conflict of interest statement before the later of the close of the nomination period or 2 days from the date of the nomination, in order for the nomination to be valid. Seconding a nomination, accepting a nomination and providing a conflict of interest statement must be conveyed by electronic means to the Constituency Secretary."


Richard Lau
DomainClip Domains Inc.
richard@xxxxxxx


Robert F. Connelly wrote:

Dear Registrars:

Here is the status of nominations for Excom officers to serve from June 2006:

Chair:
Bhavin nominated
Accepted
Not seconded
No conflict of interest statement posted.

Vice Chair:
Tim nominated
Not accepted
Not seconded
No conflict of interest statement posted.

Secretary
John Berryhill nominated
Not accepted
Not seconded
No conflict of interest statement posted.

Treasurer
Bob Connelly nominated.
Accepted
Not seconded
No conflict of interest statement posted.

Bhavin opened nominations on 19 April. By the rules, they must remain open at lease till the 26th.

On 18 April 2006, I posted a copy of the Rules of Procedure. It was posted to alert members of the Rules for amendment of motions. In checking, I see that I posted an earlier edition. While it was correct with respect to the handling of motions, it was not up to date on nominations. I have therefore posted the attached copies of the current Rules of Procedure in .doc and .rtf formats.

Respectfully submitted,
BobC




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>