Re: [registrars] FW: Registrar Failover Working Group Invitation

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

As far as I can recollect from my memory this was mainly drafted by
Louis Touton. I have no idea who else might have been working on it
(maybe Ken Stubbs). However it might have been I would like to join
in.

Best,

tom

Am 18.03.2006 schrieb Ross Rader:
> Tim Ruiz wrote:
> >>This is purely a registrar matter 
> >
> >Agree. Wasn't the original group he refers to just Registrars? Or did
> >another group convene after this one:
> >http://www.icann.org/escrow/registrar-escrow-08nov01.htm
> 
> Unknown. ICANN's interpretation of transparency doesn't include 
> publishing reports that always include the names of the parties to the 
> deliberation or consistently updating historical documents to refer to 
> any further developments that may have happened. The website documents 
> are unclear at best. Perhaps Mike Zupke could clarify this for us. As 
> you may have noticed from my tone, I'm not inclined to leave much as a 
> matter of faith when it comes to ICANNs actions as I have in the past. 
> Each time that we do, a slightly different interpretation gets 
> implemented and we're left wondering why we didn't ask more 
> questions...(Sorry folks, but fool me once...)
> 
> >In any event, we need to weigh in on this, although the timing seems a
> >bit retaliatory. Or maybe it's an attempt at distraction?
> 
> Agree - on all three points :)
>