[registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>The GNSO Council has initiatied PDP-Feb06. The purpose of this task
<BR>force is to examine the policy implications of the registry
contracts <BR>and make policy recommendations in specific areas covered
by the Task <BR>Force Terms of Reference. Each constituency may appoint
up to three <BR>representatives to this task force, one of which should
be a member of <BR>the GNSO Council.<BR><BR>Therefore, I would like to
open up nominations for the two open spots, <BR>and the single council
spot. Nominee's for either of the "open" seats <BR>must only be members
of the Registrar Constituency. Nominee's for the <BR>"council" seat must
be a member of the GNSO Council (i.e. one of Tom <BR>Keller, Ross Rader
or Bruce Tonkin).<BR><BR>This election will be conducted on one ballot.
The GNSO Council member <BR>with the highest level of support will be
appointed to the Council seat. <BR>The next two highest ranking
nominee's will be appointed to the open <BR>seats. There is no need to
specify which seat a candidate is nominated for.<BR><BR>For
example;<BR><BR>Case #1<BR>Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 40%
support<BR>Nominee #3 - 30% support<BR>Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 15%
support<BR>Nominee #4 - 10% support<BR>Nominee #1 - 5%
support<BR><BR>Nominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and
nominee's #3 and <BR>#2 would be appointed to the "open"
seats.<BR><BR>Case #2<BR>Nominee #3 - 40% support<BR>Nominee #4 - 30%
support<BR>Nominee #1 - 15% support<BR>Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 10%
support<BR>Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 5% support<BR><BR>Nominee #5 would
be appointed to the council seat, and nominee's #3 and <BR>#4 would be
appointed to the "open" seats. <BR></div>
<div>The genesis of PDP-Feb06:</div>
<div><A
href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg02124.html";>http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg02124.html</A></div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Tim <BR></div>