<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Letter to ICANN Board
- To: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Letter to ICANN Board
- From: "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:11:13 -0500
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcY0HqAYKM792BJcQM+IiGUhxQGJ+wAAMC0w
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Letter to ICANN Board
Rather than everyone just adding their name to a letter that was already
submitted (which seems a little weird given that it has already gone
in), I would strongly encourage you to each make a statement
individually to the comment section on the ICANN website.
In the past, staff have simply summed up the number of responses to
present to the board. Ie: "We had 20 emails in favour, and 10 against
the idea".
I think it is important that every individual voice their opinion on the
ICANN site itself, as it is the only official record being kept.
Rob.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 6:52 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] Letter to ICANN Board
At 02:45 PM 2/17/06, Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
>I have obtained a copy of the letter that Jon Nevett circulated. I
>believe all of us as Registrars should sign on to this letter and send
>it to the Board. I am circulating it as an attachment. All those who
>believe the content represents their view about the new proposed .com
>settlement please let me know and I will add your name and finally
>submit it to the board
Dear Bhavin: We at Domains Only are in full agreement with the content
of Jon's letter and would be pleased to have our name added to the list
of signatories. Regards, BobC
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|