ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[registrars] Constituency Statement on New gTLDs

  • To: Registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [registrars] Constituency Statement on New gTLDs
  • From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:02:03 -0500
  • Organization: Tucows Inc.
  • Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)

Registrars,

In order to better inform theGNSO's recently initiated new gTLD policy development process, I have been asked to solicit the views of the constituency on the subject. I have scheduled two calls for this week of two hours each to devote to this discussion. I don't expect that it will take a full four hours spanning two calls to cover the subject matter but did need to make arrangements to go overtime if necessary.

The calls will take place on January 18, 2006 and January 19, 2006 between 3pm EST and 5PM EST. (I apologize to those that this is inconvenient for, but this time slot has the benefit of being mostly convenient for Asia-Pacific, North America and Europe.)

If you have any questions, please let me know.



Call-in details for this teleconference is as follows:

Conference number: 1-712-432-2000 (Iowa)

When prompted, please enter the following Access Code: *493559




Background material: ICANN Staff have created a comprehensive document that outlines the prior work undertaken by ICANN in this area. While it is not necessary to actually read it all prior to the call, passing knowledge of this document will provide an enhanced understanding of the relevant issues under consideration.

GNSO Council New gTLD Issues Report: http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/gnso-issues-rpt-gtlds-05dec05.pdf

Agenda:

Our goal is to discuss and answer these following questions. Note that I am not looking to determine what the consensus position is, but rather, to simply hear what our respective inputs are. All data will be captured and included in the final document. Please review these questions and be prepared to share your thoughts.

Questions:

1. Should new generic top-level domain names be introduced? Given the information provided here and any other relevant information available to the GNSO, the GNSO should assess whether there is sufficient support within the Internet community to enable the introduction of new top-level domains. If this is the case the following additional terms of reference are applicable.

2. Selection Criteria for New Top-Level Domains
(a) Taking into account the existing selection criteria from previous top-level domain application processes and relevant criteria in registry services reallocations, develop modified or new criteria that specifically address ICANN's goals of expanding the use and usability of the Internet. In particular, examine ways in which the allocation of new top-level domains can meet demands for broader use of the Internet in developing countries.

(b) Examine whether preferential selection criteria (e.g. sponsored) could be developed which would encourage new and innovative ways of addressing the needs of Internet users.

(c) Examine whether additional criteria need to be developed which address ICANN's goals of ensuring the security and stability of the Internet.

3. Allocation Methods for New Top-Level Domains

(a) Using the experience gained in previous rounds, develop allocation methods for selecting new top-level domain names.

(b) Examine the full range of allocation methods including auctions, ballots, first-come / first-served and comparative evaluations to determine the methods of allocation that best enhance user choice while not compromising predictability and stability.

(c) Examine how allocation methods could be used to achieve ICANN's goals of fostering competition in domain name registration services and encouraging a diverse range of registry services providers.

4. Policy to Guide Contractual Conditions for New Top-Level Domains

(a) Using the experience of previous rounds of top-level domain name application processes and the recent amendments to registry services agreements, develop policies to guide the contractual criteria which are publicly available prior to any application rounds.

(b) Determine what policies are necessary to provide security and stability of registry services.

(c) Determine appropriate policies to guide a contractual compliance program for registry services.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>