RE: [registrars] Regarding policy issues raised by the proposed .com agreement

["Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe we should have the dotcom group we formed come up with a short list of
the policy issues that should be investigated by the GNSO Council and
probably go through PDP. Renewal and Pricecaps are common ones we already
know. But it is a task to word them into specific statements that are
actionable

Bruce: should we specifically do this - come up with a document from the
registrars constituency.

bhavin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 3:01 PM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Regarding policy issues raised by the 
> proposed .com agreement
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> I presented the resolution from the GNSO Council below in the ICANN
> public forum.
> 
> The chairman of the ICANN board, requested that the GNSO identify the
> policy issues that the Council wishes to investigate prior to 
> the Board
> approving any agreement.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
> 
> Whereas the GNSO constituencies participated in a review of 
> the proposed
> settlement and have detailed statements on issues of concern; 
> 
> Whereas the GNSO Council supports the conclusion of the litigation
> between ICANN and Verisign; 
> 
> Whereas the GNSO Council does not support all articles within this
> proposed settlement;
> 
> Whereas the GNSO Council believes that there are broader questions
> raised in the proposed settlement that need to be first 
> addressed by the
> GNSO;
> 
> The GNSO Council resolves:
> 
> That the ICANN Board should postpone adoption of the proposed 
> settlement
> while the Council fully investigates the policy issues raised by the
> proposed changes. 
>