<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] Regarding transition to market forces
- To: <registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] Regarding transition to market forces
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:17:24 +1100
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcXvzBC2JCB2cRJVS16w5QuSNfFXoQAAGYTQAAPjCKA=
- Thread-topic: Regarding transition to market forces
Hello All,
I find this question and answer interesting:
"Q: 1.2 Why is it appropriate for VeriSign to be allowed to raise its
prices by up to 7% per year?
A: 1.2 In order to provide for a transition to allowing market forces to
determine prices, ICANN and VeriSign agreed to relax the current price
cap, which has remained unchanged since ICANN came into existence, on a
graduated basis"
I would argue that if market forces were being applied then the price
should drop by at least 7% a year.
Thus I think it would be reasonable as part of a "transition" to market
forces that the maximum price should be DROPPING 7% per year.
I am not aware of market forces leading to an increase. I certainly
haven't seen that amongst registrars where market forces do apply.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|