ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] ICANN Board Meeting -08-Nov-05

  • To: "'Michael D. Palage'" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN Board Meeting -08-Nov-05
  • From: "Jennifer Ross-Carriere" <jen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:05:33 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <006701c5e543$54b6c1c0$0302a8c0@dnsconundrum>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcXlR+2Ay9aWolNPRtSI7kNxKiLiFgAB0gKw

Thanks Michael.

I do not see any indication that the Board extended the public comment
period for the VeriSign/ICANN settlement and the new .com agreement (or
directed the ICANN staff to do so)?  Has a formal announcement been made?  I
cannot locate it anywhere on the ICANN site. 

Jen 


Jennifer A. Ross-Carrière
General Counsel and Director of Policy
Momentous.ca Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 10:36 AM
To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [registrars] ICANN Board Meeting -08-Nov-05

Dear Registrars:

Listed below are the resolutions which the ICANN Board passed yesterday.
I have also included how I voted on the resolution along with any
questions/concerns that I may have voiced in connection with a specific
matter.

Should anyone have any questions please do not hesitate to ask.

Best regards,

Michael D. Palage



Resolution: Review and Consideration of Policy Development Process Results
and Public Comments for "Procedure for use by ICANN in considering requests
for consent and related contractual amendments to allow changes in the
architecture or operation of a gTLD registry"

Action: This resolution passed unanimously. However, I expressed reservation
regarding the 45 day frame for referral to competition authorities, and
whether that was sufficient based upon ICANN's existing experience with
competition authorities. I also asked about the enforcement power of the
major competition authorities if a third party evoked a complaint directly
with the competition authority, as opposed to ICANN referring it. I received
representations from ICANN staff in response to my questions that this
should not be a problem.


Resolution: Board Governance Committee's Recommendation for the Creation of
a new Board Compensation Committee

Action: This resolution passed with a majority of the Board voting with one
no vote. I voted in favor of this committee based upon the discussion that
the salaries of the officers would be made publicly available in accordance
with ICANN's transparency requirements.


Resolution: Approval of Board of Director's Expenses
	
Action: This resolution for reimbursement to Vint Cerf and Vanda Scartezini
for ICANN related travel expenses passed unanimously.



Resolution: Authorization to Bind Professional Liability Insurance for
Directors & Officers 

Action: This resolution passed unanimously. I requested and received
assurances from staff that these policies would be provided to Directors
during the annual meeting at the time Directors submitted their annual
conflict of interest statement.



Resolution: Approval of 177K in Legal Expenses

Action: This resolution passed unanimously. However, myself and other
directors asked for specifics in the future regarding the break down of
legal expenses instead of just monthly totals and a summary of litigation
and legal issues.



Resolution: Authorization to Enter into Addendum to Marina del Rey Sublease

Action: This resolution passed unanimously.


Resolution: Redelegation of .GS (South Georgia and South Sandwich
Islands)

Action: This resolution passed with a majority of those directors in
attendance with two abstentions. I noted for the record the second US
Principles on the Internet Domain Name and Addressing System which state
that "governments have a legitimate interest in the management of their
ccTLDs". I also note the need for ICANN/IANA to move forward expeditiously
with the translations of these key redelegation documents to help all
countries, but particularly developing countries, in this vital task.


Resolution: Proposed Guidelines for Implementation of IDN's, v.2.0

Action: This resolution passed unanimously. Given the concerns raised by
some, these guidelines were explicitly set to expire in 9 month during which
the President's IDN Committee and the other relevant working groups were to
continue their work in this area.



No specific resolutions were taken in connection with the following
issues:

-	Briefing Regarding Certain Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Budget Items

-	Single Letter 2d Level Domain Name Discussion

-	Proposed ICANN Bylaws Changes on Interim ALAC's Certification of
At-Large Structures

-	Consideration of .ASIA sTLD Application









<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>