RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position

["Paul Stahura" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>]

I also endorse Ross' motion

 

________________________________

From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 11:44 AM
To: Jay Westerdal
Cc: Paul Stahura; 'Robert F. Connelly'; 'Registrars Constituency'
Subject: RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position

 

Jay, according to our Rules of Procedure we need to first get the motion
endorsed (requires 5), then amendments can be offered. If the amendment
is accepted as friendly by the author of the motion it is incorporated
into the motion before the vote. If not, the amendment is voted on
separately along side the original motion.

 

With that in mind, I endorse Ross' motion.

Tim

	 

	
	-------- Original Message --------
	Subject: RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency
	Position
	From: "Jay Westerdal" <jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Date: Wed, October 05, 2005 1:32 pm
	To: "'Paul Stahura'" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>, "'Robert F. Connelly'"
	<BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'"
	<registrars@xxxxxxxx>
	
	Paul,
	I would propose Registries follow a documented procedure for
showing
	expiration date since they are not authoritative instead of just
hiding the
	field flat out:
	
	On expiration:
	A) if Auto-renewed by Registry
	  1) Hide Expiration date with the words "Pending Registrar
Action".
	  2) After 45 days, set expiration date to be a year from
initial
	Expiration Date.
	B) if Explicitly renewed by Registrar
	  1) Show new date 
	
	Ross if you would like to except this as a friendly amendment I
would second
	your initial motion. I am not in favor of taking the expiration
date away
	from ISP, Hosting Companies, Advisers, Friends, and Family of
the domain
	owners at the Registry level but everything else in your motion
looks good.
	
	Jay Westerdal
	Name Intelligence, Inc.
	http://www.nameintelligence.com  
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
	[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul
Stahura
	Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:50 AM
	To: Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Constituency
	Subject: RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency
Position
	
	Because then we'd all have to transmit another command to the
registry
	if the registrant paid during the 45-day period.
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
	[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F.
Connelly
	Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:31 PM
	To: Registrars Constituency
	Subject: RE: [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency
Position
	
	At 07:12 PM 10/4/05, Paul Stahura wrote:
	>2) Some registries cause another customer service problem and
that is
	>when a name is auto-renewed but the registrant hasn't paid.
	
	Dear Paul:  Why not ask registries or ICANN to have the registry
whois
	say 
	"auto-renewed" (or something like that) until the 45 days passes
unless
	the 
	registrar executes an explicit renewal?  Regards, BobC