ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] domainsbyproxy.com

  • To: John Berryhill <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] domainsbyproxy.com
  • From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:55:35 +0200 (CEST)
  • Cc: "'Marcus Faure'" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <05Sep20.122949-0700_pdt.369130-30028+21124@lmg09.affinity.com> from John Berryhill at "Sep 20, 2005 03:29:45 pm"
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks, I was not aware of that. Now I know how to proceed.

Yours,
Marcus


> 
> 
> >Do you think that is a legal service? My reading of the whois guidelines
> >makes me believe that the real owner has to appear in the whois. 
> 
> 
> It is specifically authorized by ICANN in the Registrar Accreditation
> Agreement:
> 
> http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm#3
> ------------------
> 3.7.7.3 Any Registered Name Holder that intends to license use of a domain
> name to a third party is nonetheless the Registered Name Holder of record
> and is responsible for providing its own full contact information and for
> providing and updating accurate technical and administrative contact
> information adequate to facilitate timely resolution of any problems that
> arise in connection with the Registered Name. A Registered Name Holder
> licensing use of a Registered Name according to this provision shall accept
> liability for harm caused by wrongful use of the Registered Name, unless it
> promptly discloses the identity of the licensee to a party providing the
> Registered Name Holder reasonable evidence of actionable harm
> --------------
> 
> Your customer may file a UDRP, and it is then incumbent upon GoDaddy to
> supply the contact information to the dispute resolution provider.
> 
> The National Arbitration Forum is notable in its inability to understand
> that ICANN has established this procedure, so even when the proxy service
> provides the contact information to the NAF, they will still often go
> forward with the name of the proxy service and you will see UDRP decisions
> which issue against proxy services.  They don't care.  They don't have to.
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>