<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Update on the .NET RRA Taskforce
- To: "'Jordyn Buchanan'" <jbuchanan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Update on the .NET RRA Taskforce
- From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:16:06 +0530
- Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <B231D476A3789B4ABEAED0CA1B12996301B0A42A@EXCHANGE.corp.register.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcWnN7NkqQSPMo0IQwe1YI8NKH8B2AAClGGwAAEqvWA=
I endorse this motion
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jordyn Buchanan [mailto:jbuchanan@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 11:21 PM
> To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx; Bhavin Turakhia
> Cc: Registrars Constituency
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Update on the .NET RRA Taskforce
>
> I endorse this motion.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:26 PM
> To: Bhavin Turakhia
> Cc: 'Registrars Constituency'
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Update on the .NET RRA Taskforce
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> There appears to be some doubt as to the level of support
> that this working group has from our constituency. In order
> to clarify this for those outside our constituency, I'd like
> to propose a formal motion that this document become an
> official position of the constituency and that the .net WG
> are empowered to formally continue advocating these consensus
> recommendationsto ICANN staff and Verisign for the purpose of
> achieving an outcome that prefers the interests of the
> membership of this constituency.
>
> This is largely a symbolic motion and not intended to change
> or alter the constituency position in any way. I am simply
> intending to provide the WG with the full and formal support
> of this constituency in order to further dispell the notion
> that there is a lack of unity in support of these recommendations.
>
> On 18/08/2005 11:44 AM Bhavin Turakhia noted that;
> > Hi all
> >
> > The .NET RRA Taskforce has been working diligently on making
> > amendments to the new .NET RRA to reverse/reduce the damage
> caused by
> > the modifications to the .NET Contract. We have finalized a draft
> > version of our proposed changes to the .NET RRA which
> addresses most
> > of the concerns which I publically announced on behalf of all
> > Registrars at Luxembourg as well as other concerns which Registrars
> > have raised directly to the taskforce or members of the
> taskforce. It
> also ties in some other loose ends.
> >
> > We will keep all of you updated of the progress. Meanwhile
> if anyone
> > wants a confidential redlined version of the final document you can
> > send a private email to Jon Nevett or myself.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Bhavin
> >
> >
>
>
> - --
> - --
> Regards,
>
>
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every
> instrument,
> every utensil, every article designed for
> use, of each
> and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
> - Robert Collier
>
>
> Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
> My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
>
> iD8DBQFDCfyM6sL06XjirooRAqE8AJwKkozCuM0gcgRuU/erux5p+VuL0ACePCZc
> xrvAVaLg97jeqcK/bcvmczU=
> =4LZz
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|