ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Update on the .NET RRA Taskforce

  • To: jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Update on the .NET RRA Taskforce
  • From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:49:17 -0700
  • Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx, ross@xxxxxxxxxx, bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I endorse this motion as well.

Tim Ruiz
GoDaddy


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Update on the .NET RRA Taskforce
> From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, August 22, 2005 12:25 pm
> To: "Ross Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Bhavin Turakhia"
> <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> I endorse the motion.  Thanks.  Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:26 PM
> To: Bhavin Turakhia
> Cc: 'Registrars Constituency'
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Update on the .NET RRA Taskforce
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> There appears to be some doubt as to the level of support that this
> working group has from our constituency. In order to clarify this for
> those outside our constituency, I'd like to propose a formal motion that
> this document become an official position of the constituency and that
> the .net WG are empowered to formally continue advocating these
> consensus recommendationsto ICANN staff and Verisign for the purpose of
> achieving an outcome that prefers the interests of the membership of
> this constituency.
> 
> This is largely a symbolic motion and not intended to change or alter
> the constituency position in any way. I am simply intending to provide
> the WG with the full and formal support of this constituency in order to
> further dispell the notion that there is a lack of unity in support of
> these recommendations.
> 
> On 18/08/2005 11:44 AM Bhavin Turakhia noted that;
> > Hi all
> > 
> > The .NET RRA Taskforce has been working diligently on making
> amendments to
> > the new .NET RRA to reverse/reduce the damage caused by the
> modifications to
> > the .NET Contract. We have finalized a draft version of our proposed
> changes
> > to the .NET RRA which addresses most of the concerns which I
> publically
> > announced on behalf of all Registrars at Luxembourg as well as other
> > concerns which Registrars have raised directly to the taskforce or
> members
> > of the taskforce. It also ties in some other loose ends.
> > 
> > We will keep all of you updated of the progress. Meanwhile if anyone
> wants a
> > confidential redlined version of the final document you can send a
> private
> > email to Jon Nevett or myself.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Bhavin
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> - --
> - --
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
>                        -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                 "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
>                  every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
>                  and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
>                         - Robert Collier
> 
> 
> Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
> My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
> 
> iD8DBQFDCfyM6sL06XjirooRAqE8AJwKkozCuM0gcgRuU/erux5p+VuL0ACePCZc
> xrvAVaLg97jeqcK/bcvmczU=
> =4LZz
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>