<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] .NET Agreement Update
- To: michael@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [registrars] .NET Agreement Update
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:18:05 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <00a801c5a53d$38100810$6501a8c0@dnsconundrum> from "Michael D. Palage" at "Aug 20, 2005 00:11:18 am"
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
it is great to see that we are being heard. However, there seems to be some
confusion in that announcement. We have forwarded a unanimous position to
ICANN, yet the announcement speaks about a number of positions.
For me the bottomline is that there was no need for ICANN to change the
draft agreement.
In any case, if ICANN asks for public input, I suggest we give it.
@Bhavin: Can you organise a formal position of the RC? I am not sure if
we can use the paper that we voted on in Luxembourg can be reused.
Marcus
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-19aug05.htm
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|