Re: [registrars] Domain Registry Support

[Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>]

Marcus Faure wrote:

> Hi Rick,
>
> is there a charge for the service?
>  
no, nore is one is planned

> If CORE were to participate, we would inform the respective member who
> is in charge of the compromised domain, but would not enforce to take
> it down.
>  
great. I'll work on putting a formal note togther for registrars and how 
it all works.
-rick

> Yours,
> Marcus
>
>  
>
> > Something I've been doing for network service providers is a daily 
> > report on compromised systems. I'm working with APWG on
> > a system to desiminate information about phishing to registrars and 
> > NSPs. We are finalizing the agreement and the folks at APWG would like 
> > to know who would be interested in participating.
> > The system is real time, notices in text and xml using jabber as the 
> > transport. Also if anyone of you have an ASN and would like reports on 
> > your network let me know.
> > in short would anyone use authenticated information about a fishing 
> > attack to place the domain on hold? also the jabber infrastructure could 
> > be leveraged for regular IM instead of a mailing list. Most of the folks 
> > going after botnets are moving from lists to IM because of the 
> > timeliness of the information.
> > -rick
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jim Archer wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > Would it be possible or desirable to set up a special RC list just to 
> > > announce scams and such?  That would be a relatively low traffic list 
> > > and we could all add representatives who are not interested in most 
> > > discussion here but who are responsible for these kind of consumer 
> > > affairs issues.
> > > This might be an effective for all of us to help protect our customers...
> > >
> > > What does everyone think?
> > >
> > >      
>