ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] ICANN Bylaws

  • To: "Paul Stahura" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>, "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN Bylaws
  • From: "Clint Page" <cpage@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:08:33 -0700
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <0584E286D9C3C045B61DAB692193170B055AC6C0@yew2.wou3.local>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dotster supports these changes.

Clint
  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Paul Stahura
  Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:34 PM
  To: Nevett, Jonathon; Registrars Constituency
  Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN Bylaws


  eNom supports these changes.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon
  Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 6:57 AM
  To: Registrars Constituency
  Subject: [registrars] ICANN Bylaws



  All:



  Attached is a redline of changes to two sections of the ICANN Bylaws that
Network Solutions is pursuing with the ICANN Board to address the breach of
trust surrounding the .net contract approval process.  Any support would be
appreciated.



  Thanks.



  Jon
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>