[registrars] Regarding rules of procedure

["Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Marcus,

Or maybe even to two.

Proposer and seconder.

I agree that we have been too slow to move positions forward to a vote.

I would find it useful to know how many registrars support a particular
position, even if not all registrars vote on a particular position.

We may want to require a minimum number (or percentage of votes) for a
vote to actually result in a policy position from the constituency  (ie
some sort of quorum provision).

Regards,
Bruce
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marcus Faure
> Sent: Friday, 8 July 2005 7:19 AM
> To: Nevett, Jonathon
> Cc: Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Constituency; RC Voting Members
> Subject: [registrars] Re: Tentative Agenda for Luxembourg 
> ICANN meetings.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I suggest to decrease the number of endorsements necessary 
> from 5 to 3. 
> This is to encourage more activity in the RC as I think we 
> have not seen enough things moving in the past.
> 
> Yours,
> Marcus
>