<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Taskforce for New RAA Discussions
- To: Bhavin Turakhia <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Taskforce for New RAA Discussions
- From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:16:27 -0500
- Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200503301935.j2UJZ1W16063@pechora.icann.org>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <200503301935.j2UJZ1W16063@pechora.icann.org>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
Hi all
I propose that we form a small team within the Registrars constituency that
will record all the items that we as Registrars feel should be considered
and then represent our interests in discussions with ICANN about the new
RAA.
If all are in agreement, then please shoot an email to the list if you wish
to be on this taskforce to discuss the areas of change/update in the RAA
with ICANN
Your proposal presumes that changing the contract is appropriate. ICANN
has stated that it should be updated, but this does not necessarily make
it so. My preference would be to listen to their presentation in MdP and
discuss our reaction at that time.
Personally, I am not aware of any compelling reasons why the RAA needs
to be renegotiated. I'm open to discussion on this point, but this
hasn't happened yet.
--
-rwr
Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|