ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Taskforce for New RAA Discussions

  • To: Bhavin Turakhia <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Taskforce for New RAA Discussions
  • From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:16:27 -0500
  • Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <200503301935.j2UJZ1W16063@pechora.icann.org>
  • Organization: Tucows Inc.
  • References: <200503301935.j2UJZ1W16063@pechora.icann.org>
  • Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
Hi all

I propose that we form a small team within the Registrars constituency that
will record all the items that we as Registrars feel should be considered
and then represent our interests in discussions with ICANN about the new

If all are in agreement, then please shoot an email to the list if you wish
to be on this taskforce to discuss the areas of change/update in the RAA
with ICANN

Your proposal presumes that changing the contract is appropriate. ICANN has stated that it should be updated, but this does not necessarily make it so. My preference would be to listen to their presentation in MdP and discuss our reaction at that time.

Personally, I am not aware of any compelling reasons why the RAA needs to be renegotiated. I'm open to discussion on this point, but this hasn't happened yet.



Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>