RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:04:55 -0600
- Cc: "'Robert F. Connelly'" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <41F9564A.email@example.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In that case, I accept Jon's amendment as friendly, offer and accept my
proposed amendment as noted below.
Bob, at this point, I'd like to call for a vote.
From: Ross Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 3:00 PM
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: 'Robert F. Connelly'; 'Registrars Constituency'
Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I believe you can accept Jon's amendment as friendly, offer the
amendment you propose below (and accept it yourself) which doesn't reset
the clock in the least.
Any indications of support are purely symbolic if you choose to accept
Jon's amendment as friendly (as sweeping as it is...)
Your choice ;)
On 27/01/2005 3:46 PM Tim Ruiz noted that;
| I think where we at an entirely new (and better) motion needing 5
| endorsements. I add my endorsement to the motion and offer this proposed
| amendment (hopefully taken as friendly):
| I propose this paragraph in the motion be removed:
| Whereas, it is appropriate to notify registrants that their data will be
| included in the Whois system and to obtain Registrants' acknowledgement of
| the fact that their data is included in the Whois system as part of the
| registration process prior to the completion of a registration
| Otherwise, I think we have the 5 endorsements for this motion (Ross, Tom,
| Bruce, Bob, and myself).
| Strictly by our Rules, this does reset the clock a bit. But Tom indicated
| that he and Paul can work with this with the understanding that it has yet
| to go to a formal vote.
| If my above proposed change is accepted as friendly the change can be made
| before submitting it to the Task Force. Otherwise it can just be
| the ballot when we vote.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
| Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 1:52 PM
| To: Robert F. Connelly
| Cc: Registrars Constituency
| Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf
| 1/2 recommendations
| On 26/01/2005 3:29 PM Robert F. Connelly noted that;
| | At 07:51 AM 1/26/05, Ross Rader wrote:
| |> As one of the supporters of Tim's original motion, I would also like to
| |> lend my endorsement to this amendment.
| | Let me the third to endorse this draft.
| What are the next steps and schedule as it relates to this motion?
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
My weblog: http://www.byte.org /
My podcasts: http://www.byte.org/Syndicasts/
My RSS: http://www.byte.org/blog/cmd=manage_notices
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----