ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations

  • To: <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Robert F. Connelly'" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf 1/2 recommendations
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:46:51 -0600
  • Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <41F94676.4050009@tucows.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I think where we at an entirely new (and better) motion needing 5
endorsements. I add my endorsement to the motion and offer this proposed
amendment (hopefully taken as friendly):

I propose this paragraph in the motion be removed:

Whereas, it is appropriate to notify registrants that their data will be
included in the Whois system and to obtain Registrants' acknowledgement of
the fact that their data is included in the Whois system as part of the
registration process prior to the completion of a registration transaction;

Otherwise, I think we have the 5 endorsements for this motion (Ross, Tom,
Bruce, Bob, and myself). 

Strictly by our Rules, this does reset the clock a bit. But Tom indicated
that he and Paul can work with this with the understanding that it has yet
to go to a formal vote.

If my above proposed change is accepted as friendly the change can be made
before submitting it to the Task Force. Otherwise it can just be included on
the ballot when we vote.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 1:52 PM
To: Robert F. Connelly
Cc: Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] RE: Call for Constituency statements on Whois tf
1/2 recommendations

Hash: SHA1

On 26/01/2005 3:29 PM Robert F. Connelly noted that;
| At 07:51 AM 1/26/05, Ross Rader wrote:
|> As one of the supporters of Tim's original motion, I would also like to
|> lend my endorsement to this amendment.
| Let me the third to endorse this draft.

What are the next steps and schedule as it relates to this motion?

- --

~                       -rwr

Skydasher: A great way to start your day

My contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
My weblog: http://www.byte.org /
My podcasts: http://www.byte.org/Syndicasts/
My RSS: http://www.byte.org/blog/cmd=manage_notices

Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>