<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] RE: Move the adoption of the RC budget posted by the RC Treasurer.
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] RE: Move the adoption of the RC budget posted by the RC Treasurer.
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <BobC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:51:38 -0700
- In-reply-to: <LOAD-PROC04tfjD3E1T000289ec@smtp-ent.load.com>
- References: <LOAD-PROC04tfjD3E1T000289ec@smtp-ent.load.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<html>
<body>
At 02:05 PM 10/25/04, Bhavin Turakhia wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="arial" size=2 color="#0000FF">however
it is pragmatic and prudent at this point in time to wrap up the budget
so as to allow members to pay their dues instead of discussing items
whose expenses are not really going to materialize in this year anyways
</font></blockquote><br>
Dear Rick and all other Members:<br><br>
We had many discussions in KL about the fact that we really don't know
for sure which Registrars are entitled to vote on candidates and
issues.<br><br>
The budget was discussed in KL and really ready for a vote at that
time. However, Elana resigned and it got off the track. I
wanted to discuss and vote on the budget immediately. However, some
felt we should elect a new Chair first.<br><br>
Based upon the approval of this budget, invoices will be sent to all
registrars. The invoices will include a provision to verify that
the By-Law provision on ownership. The invoice will also ask the
registrar to designate<font color="#FF0000"> who will vote for the
registrar.<br><br>
</font>We need to have that last provision (designation of voters) in
order to "clean up" the present list of voting
members.<br><br>
Thus, we need to approve the 2004 budget promptly.<br><br>
Regards, BobC<br>
</body>
</html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|