<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Transfers: Back to square one
- To: Bhavin Turakhia <bhavin.t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Transfers: Back to square one
- From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:27:27 -0400
- Cc: "'CHAVANIS Vincent'" <vincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>, registrars@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200410221406.i9ME6ol09355@pechora.icann.org>
- Organization: Tucows Inc.
- References: <200410221406.i9ME6ol09355@pechora.icann.org>
- Reply-to: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 22/10/2004 10:29 AM Bhavin Turakhia noted that;
| ROSS: would this not violate the new transfers policy?? Can anyone
from the
| trfer task force comment?
Based on my read of the policy, it would all depend on the actual
mechanics of their particular unlock process. If its reasonable and
accessible, then in my opinion, no.
Also note that we are going into a review process with this policy
shortly, so it will be important to get your respective views regarding
how this policy is and is not working on the record so it can be taken
into account.
- --
~ -rwr
~ "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
~ every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
~ and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
~ - Robert Collier
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFBeRjP6sL06XjirooRAm2ZAJ9Lxb/Oz96YOwSvOvmRCfUbto1VAwCeLjy/
T6dA+clo5413bfxGNj4iX0k=
=VWMW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|