<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Issue with icann budget model
- To: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Issue with icann budget model
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:53:20 +1000
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcSwl5jeCKDOpjF6QU2m+UbaM13iRgAHu0iQ
- Thread-topic: [registrars] Issue with icann budget model
Hello Bhavin,
>
> One of the issues I had discussing with Kurt about the new
> budget is an issue in the new proposed model
>
> In the new model a 25 cents transaction fee for every transaction.
>
> However this brings up two issues
>
> * what happens to domains deleted in the add grace / renewal
> grace / transfer grace period. All those transactions MUST
> not count. Icann has yet to issue clarity on that
>
> * what happens to domains in auto-renew period. The renew
> transaction charge CANNOT be applied to a registrar unless
> the auto-renew period is over and the domain is still with
> the registrar. Or else there will be issues like the domain
> will get transferred away to another registrar and the older
> one will have to bear an unnecessary charge. Also if the
> domain is deleted within auto-renew the charge would not apply
>
> It is important for us to ensure that ICANN and the
> registries are clear about the charging model in their
> calculations so as to prevent issues where registrars get
> charged for domains that are not eventually renewed or are deleted
>
Thanks for spotting those issues. I agree with you on both counts.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|