ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] drop pool registrars

  • To: "'Rick Wesson'" <wessorh@xxxxxx>, "'Mike Lampson'" <lampson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] drop pool registrars
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 18:16:25 -0500
  • Cc: "'Registrars List'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410051058130.11981@king.ar.com>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The transaction model is not yet in affect. The existing budget was
extended. The Board did approve the new budget at the meeting in KL in July,
but the affective date was left open so that ICANN could continue to work
with Registrars to address concerns.

I suspect we will be hearing an announcement within the next couple of weeks
regarding the new budget taking affect.

Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Wesson
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 1:00 PM
To: Mike Lampson
Cc: Registrars List
Subject: RE: [registrars] drop pool registrars

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Mike Lampson wrote:

> Rick,
>
> I agree with your conclusions.  However I believe it will happen much
> sooner.
>
> 1) The 2005 budget went into effect on July 1, 2004.  Your $0.25 per
> transaction invoice for last quarter should be arriving from ICANN this
> month.

ouch, does this mean we will see the 4K per quarter charge for batch pool
registrars this quarter?

Already, I'm not sure I want to pay my ICANN bill.

-rick





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>