<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Motion to amend voting procedures.
- To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>, Bob Connelly <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Motion to amend voting procedures.
- From: "Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:55:07 +0200
- In-reply-to: <6.1.2.0.2.20040922070714.042d6eb0@pop3.loadmail.com>
- Reply-to: svl@xxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Siegfried Langenbach second that motion.
On 22 Sep 2004 at 7:23, Bob Connelly wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:23:51 -0700
To: Registrars Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
From: Bob Connelly <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [registrars] Motion to amend voting procedures.
[...]
>
> MOTION:
> I hereby move that we have a runoff election between the two proposals with
> the highest percentage of the prior vote, specifically:
>
> 1. Post individual voting results, but only at the conclusion of the voting
> period.
> 2. Continue to post individual voting results, during the entire voting period.
>
> end quote:
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|