<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Improper Balloting
- To: "'Robert F. Connelly'" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Improper Balloting
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:43:03 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <6.1.2.0.2.20040920081001.038fe4b0@mail.beach.net>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bob,
That's not correct. Please review the results again. 52% of the membership
did vote, but 48% of those voting wanted the individual voting results to be
available during the entire voting period.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 10:13 AM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Improper Balloting
At 03:15 AM 9/20/04, Bhavin Turakhia wrote:
> > The result was that individual voting results would be
> > published in real time during the entire voting period.
> >
> > However, on the new Chair ballot presented, I notice that the
> > ballot and voting procedure is not adhering to this standard,
> > namely that the results of the individual votes are being
> > with-held until after the close of the auction.
Dear Tim: You misread the results. 52% voted against such a system.
Rick told us there was no alternative in Boardrooms.com but I find there is
considerable flexibility. For example, Thomas Mörz was among those who
asked that only the summary be made public. I find that option also exists.
Regards, BobC
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|