<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] New transfer policy concerns (fwd)
- To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: [registrars] New transfer policy concerns (fwd)
- From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:34:11 +0200 (CEST)
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
it seems that this mail only reached a part of the list participants, so here
comes the second attempt.
Yours,
Marcus
----- Forwarded message from Marcus Faure -----
>From faure Thu Aug 26 15:52:28 2004
Subject: New transfer policy concerns
To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:52:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
Hi,
I am beginning to ask myself if the enforcement of the new transfer policy
will take effect on November 12. I will share my experience with verisign and
pir as we are responsible for the communication with these registries inside
CORE.
- Both registries have not published any documentation or software regarding
registry changes, e.g. transfer undos
- verisign has not confirmed that they will use authinfo codes after epp
transition
- verisign told us there is no "dead end" date for rrp, meaning some registrars
will be on epp and some may stay on rrp (forever?). There is no information
how transfers will work between rrp and epp registrars
- verisign will stay thin, whois standardization is not around. This means that
all existing registrars will have to implement a new whois parser for each
new registrar that show up. This can't be it.
And these are only the major issues.
I wonder how we should solve this before November.
Yours,
Marcus
----- End of forwarded message from Marcus Faure -----
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|