ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Nominations for Chair.

  • To: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Nominations for Chair.
  • From: "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 11:55:41 -0400
  • Cc: "'Registrars Constituency'" <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <200409021135.i82BZ001003921@nic-naa.net>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Eric,

My statement does not preclude anyone from joining at this time, but they
must pay the old $750 fee.  If I recall correctly, the new proposed fee was
slightly less (but it might have been the same).  If less, I assumed that
some would want to wait to join.

But there is absolutely nothing that prevents a registrar from paying $750
now and joining, as per Tim Ruiz's email.

Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
[mailto:brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 7:35 AM
To: Rob Hall
Cc: tbarrett; 'Robert F. Connelly'; 'Registrars Constituency';
brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Nominations for Chair.


Rob,

As you'll recall we weren't able formally to "agree" on a position
concerning
the WLS, so I borrowed Bhavin's laptop and submitted a proposal that in the
due course of time was balloted.

I haven't noticed anything resembling this in the subject under discussion.
Is this something I missed while on holiday, or was this decision simply one
of the members present at KL.

I have some concerns about not allowing accredited registrars to join the
RC until some unrelated predicate condition is satisfied, and what if the
budget takes longer than a nominal amount of time to approve?

Eric




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>