RE: [registrars] Regarding membership list

["Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob:

I will review my old files to provide you with the previous records.
Obviously that would not include any fees collected since last Sring when
the former ExCom stepped down.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 11:05 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: Re: [registrars] Regarding membership list


At 06:25 PM 8/31/04, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>Hello Tom,
>
> >
> > 1. Publish the list of registrars that you consider eligible
> > to vote in this election.
>
>A good idea.
>
> >From the bylaws at:
>http://www.icann-registrars.org/docs/gnso-rc-bylaws.doc
>
>"2.4. Publication of Membership - Contact details for each Member, and
>Registered Representatives shall be published on the Registrar
>Constituency web site. This publication will constitute the formal
>membership of the Constituency. Only Representatives listed in this
>publication will be able to vote or otherwise fully participate in the
>business of the Constituency unless the Member has appointed a new
>representative per Section 2.2 and 2.3 of these bylaws"
>
>There currently is not a list of members published on the constituency
>website
>(http://www.icann-registrars.org).

Dear Bruce:  We keep chasing our tails:-(  The old web site is a mess --
written using Microsoft Home Page -- spaces, mixed upper and lower cases in
file names and directory names.  Ross is working on a more friendly web
site -- the money for it is in the budget -- thus we must vote on budget
before anything else!!!

Cordially, BobC, Secretary




> >
> > 2. For those registrars not on the official list: outline the
> > specific criteria, process and deadline that needs to be
> > followed for them to become eligible to vote for this election.
>
>The criteria are clear: you must be an ICANN accredited registrar
>
>The process is less clear.
>
>I believe that there is currently a $750 joining fee and then an annual
>fee.
>
>I don't believe an annual fee has been charged since 2002.
>
>Here are some historical links to the postings on memberships that I
>could find:
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/msg03579.html
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc02/msg00355.html
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc02/msg00357.html
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc02/msg00595.html
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc02/msg00663.html
>
>Here is a treasurers report for 2002
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/msg03793.html
>
>One of the tasks for the registrars constituency is to agree a budget
>and fees structure.
>
>I am in favour of an annual fee, as this helps keep our membership list
>current.  I am also in favour of the constituency including in the
>budget, funds for paying someone to manage this process and keep the
>membership list up-to-date and published on our official website.
>
>Regards,
>Bruce