<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
- To: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jay Westerdal" <jwesterdal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
- From: "Rob Hall" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:43:36 -0400
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <200408101919.i7AJJOMK008818@nic-naa.net>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I can't believe that IANA would recycle the same ID's for a new Registrar.
Surely, they would simply issue a brand new idea, and the old Registrar
would keep theirs forever. This would solve the problem of a Registrar
being de-accredited. The ID would remain the same.
You might want to include an additional status, or message along with it,
but we should work towards standardizing the Registrar ID's, and ensuring
they never get recycled.
Rob.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Eric
Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:19 PM
To: Jay Westerdal
Cc: 'Marcus Faure'; registrars@xxxxxxxx; brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
Jay,
This is a good point. The set of code points "current" at any point in
time at the IANA registry doesn't account for registry-transitional
"registrars", nor can it account for registrars no longer "current"
(ICANN accredited) -- rather like the .su country code.
I suspect we need something more.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|