ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[registrars] Standard IDs for ICANN accredited registrars

  • To: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [registrars] Standard IDs for ICANN accredited registrars
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:45:33 +1000
  • Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcR+te8DgE8Hx5ziTXqNMxfDRiDhlgAAE1mQ
  • Thread-topic: Standard IDs for ICANN accredited registrars

I think standardised IDs for ICANN accredited registrars would be a good
idea.

Regards,
Bruce
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marcus Faure
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2004 6:39 PM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I propose that the registries implement the following change:
> 
> Instead of using proprietory registrar ids, standardized ids 
> shall be used both on protocol level (rrp/epp/reports etc.) 
> and in the whois output.
> 
> The effect would be that for example CORE is IANA-15 in all 
> registry communication and not R135-LRMS at Afilias, R23-LROR 
> at PIR and so on.
> Especially transfers would become simpler, e.g. registrants 
> will be less confused who they want to transfer their domain to,
> 
> Yours,
> Marcus
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>