<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] Standard IDs for ICANN accredited registrars
- To: "Marcus Faure" <faure@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [registrars] Standard IDs for ICANN accredited registrars
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:45:33 +1000
- Cc: <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcR+te8DgE8Hx5ziTXqNMxfDRiDhlgAAE1mQ
- Thread-topic: Standard IDs for ICANN accredited registrars
I think standardised IDs for ICANN accredited registrars would be a good
idea.
Regards,
Bruce
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marcus Faure
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2004 6:39 PM
> To: registrars@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [registrars] Using IANA IDs
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I propose that the registries implement the following change:
>
> Instead of using proprietory registrar ids, standardized ids
> shall be used both on protocol level (rrp/epp/reports etc.)
> and in the whois output.
>
> The effect would be that for example CORE is IANA-15 in all
> registry communication and not R135-LRMS at Afilias, R23-LROR
> at PIR and so on.
> Especially transfers would become simpler, e.g. registrants
> will be less confused who they want to transfer their domain to,
>
> Yours,
> Marcus
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|